It is a fast drive, very comparable to the FireCuda 530 and the WD-BLACK Gen4 NVMe SSDs. In RND4K Q1T1 data the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB also provides higher write performance by 22%. CrystalDiskMark was the closest to the 7,300MB/s max sequential read and 6,900MB/s max sequential write. If you are looking for other free alternatives, we recommend you to download HD Tune or PC Wizard. It allows you to measure your disks sequential read and write speeds. It literally has double the write performance which is a really big deal. CrystalDiskMark is an easy way to detect any possible physical problem on your hard drive. CrystalDiskMark is a disk benchmark software. In RND4K Q32T16 the Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB destroys the XPG SX8100NP in read and write performance. Now we come to the random data performance. However, the tables really turn on the write speed with the Samsung 970 Evo 1TB providing 26% more write performance, which is quite a difference. We aren’t sure why, but we double-checked the result and it was true. CrystalDiskMark on your SQL - YOUR RESPONSES NEEDED Posted by Rahd2k2 on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:53 AM Microsoft SQL Server. This time the XPG SSD takes the lead by a large margin, 14%. On SEQ1M Q1T1 data there’s a huge difference in the read performance. This is a great start for sequential data. On Write the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD is 10% faster on write speeds and reaches its rated 2500MB/s write speed. The Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD is about 3% faster on read performance and achieves over the 3400MB/s rated speed up to 3570MB/s which is excellent. In this first graph, we are comparing the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD to the XPG SX8100NP 2TB SSD in CrystalDiskMark SEQ1M Q8T1 Read and Write. As you read through the data remember the specific specifications for the model MZ-V7E1T0BW Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB drive we have are rated at 3400MB/s Sequential Read and 2500MB/s Sequential Write.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |